Notice I said that I don't like to watch basketball—I didn't say anything about playing it, which I did up until middle school. In fact, I happen to be the 1992-93 champion of my hometown's Pass, Dribble & Shoot contest. To this day I'm still not sure how I miraculously placed first in these competitions in consecutive years, since I was just decent at basketball and ended up finishing ahead of guys who went on to play for my high school team. It's been years since I've hit the hardwood, but it was always fun to play.
Now, every sport is better to watch in person, basketball included. But there are two reasons why I dislike watching basketball in particular:
- Too much scoring. The back-and-forth nature of the sport and the frequent amount of scoring is the big killer for me. One of the reasons that makes football or hockey more interesting to watch is that a goal or a touchdown isn't scored on every single possession. So when those things do occur, they're meaningful.
- Survival through infractions. When your team is trailing in the final minutes of a basketball game, desperate measures sink to a new low. With a remote chance (at best) of victory, the only way to climb out of the hole is to foul the hell out of your opponent—which almost always just puts you in your grave. Not only does this disrupt the flow and make games very frustrating to watch, but it exposes an inherent flaw in the sport: survival through infractions. There should be a rule that prevents teams from doing this in the final two minutes if they're trailing by more than 10 points—something to prevent the prolonging, end the futility, and put lame-duck teams out of their misery.
When it comes to last-ditch efforts, survival through infractions is easily the worst late-game strategy in all of sports, and the only one where penalty-taking is encouraged. Think about it. In football, teams have the hurry-up offense, the onside kick, and the Hail Mary at their disposal. In soccer and hockey, teams can pull their goalie for an extra attacker. In baseball, well, you just have to figure a way to actually beat your opponent without resorting to gimmicks.
Toward the end of a close game in all of these sports, you won't see a defensive lineman deliberately jumping offside, a hockey forward taking an avoidable roughing penalty, or a slugger leaning into a pitch to get on first base.
- Basketball owns all sports, man why do u diss basketball, ohh because u aint knowing shit about the sport
- BASKETBALL SUCKS YOU KNOW AMERICAS SPORT IS FOOTBALL
- Ha! this article is a joke. Hockey and soccer are snooze-fests which is why no one watches them. Considering the ball/puck size to goal/net ratio and the lack of scoring, it's hard to even call them athletes. Everyone just flails around, hardly controlling the puck/ball, like a bunch of idiot barbarians with no strategy. You couldn't pay me to sit through a boring hockey game. It may be fun for you playing since you dont have any real athletic skill, but as a spectator (girl) your sport puts me to sleep.
- Basketball does suck...nothing makes me laugh more than when ESPN or some other sports network gives a basketball score in the 1st or 2nd quarter.....Rockets are up on the Bulls "10 - 8" ......oh,like that's score's not gonna change a million times...lol Why give the damn score???? who cares!!! Hockey rules!!
- THE WORLD is watching tv during the FIFA WORLDCUP! dont be so american, it sucks as much as basketball
- Basketball offers no fun or excitement... It's like cloning sheep.
One thing basketball's got right is March Madness, which is really a beautiful thing. In what other sport can I ignore the entire season and somehow come out near the top in office pools year after year?
But it's more than that. Actually, it's kind of like the Olympics—it doesn't matter if you've never followed international snowboarding—you want to see what happens because it's the Olympics. March Madness has that same kind of magnetism that pulls you in, even just casually, because you know everyone's attention is on it. SI.com's Michael Rosenberg is with me in his most recent article, Why the NCAA tournament is best sporting event in America:
"The NCAA tournament starts around St. Patrick's Day and encourages you to watch a different TV with each eyeball while taking no-look sips from your pint...wait, that's not what I meant to say. What I meant is that if you're old enough to drink, you have sat through enough lousy Super Bowls and boring World Series games and monotonous NBA Finals to appreciate how reliably awesome the NCAA tournament is. There are two reasons for this:
1. It's never overhyped.
2. It never disappoints.
This is the rare sporting event that is riveting if you know everything there is to know about it or nothing at all... Thanks to its universal gambling appeal, the NCAA tournament brings people together."
3 comments:
Two comments:
1. I've thought about the march madness comparison to the olympics before too. I think it's apt not only for the reason you mention (everyone cares even if they don't), but also because you hear names of people that almost immediately fade into obscurity except for a select few - just like olympic athletes.
2. I don't think there's too much scoring in basketball. The excitement of each basket doesn't match that of each goal in hockey, but it doesn't have to. Basketball is much more a sport of ebbs and flows and of momentum (of course hockey has momentum, but without goals, that momentum is nothing - a goal from the team on the wrong end of momentum erases and reverses it). Teams chip away at the score. A 15 point lead can't be erased in a dramatic 90 seconds, but it can be gradually narrowed, then passed. I didn't really get this until I started watching more basketball a few years ago. I still like hockey a lot better, but I can't discount hoops just because there are a lot of points.
I think what makes everyone, even people like me, appreciate March Madness is the general level of competition and how great the tournament is set up. Do I really care about college basketball? No, but it's fun filling out a bracket and seeing how things shake out, especially if you stay in the hunt. It never disappoints, like that writer says.
One of the haters on AssociatedContent actually made a point that I couldn't disagree with: No sport is perfect; each one has at least one flaw that most people can agree on. I think this is true. It's just a matter of what you can tolerate.
On that note, you're right in that basketball doesn't have to be like football or hockey score-wise, but for me this is what I think makes it less interesting. And it's not like I'm an advocate of low-scoring games in general (soccer has the opposite problem of basketball—cue up my "Why Soccer Sucks" article), but I just like balance. I suppose that because goaltending isn't encouraged in basketball, points are meant to be scored.
I know it sounds weird because normally a person in my position would be satisfied with themselves. But I have to admit that being a man with a huge penis has serious drawbacks, I can't fit it into my pants. Girls stare at it all day and I feel so embarrassed. I wear long shirts that hang over my crotch so people don't see it. When I wear shorts, it flops around and sometimes hangs out of my shorts. It's terrible.
Post a Comment